These opinions warrantied for the lifetime of your brain.

Loading Table of Contents...

Thursday, March 6, 2008

RE: [ca-liberty] New poll for ca-liberty

Jeff Chan wrote:

JC) HTML is potentially very dangerous and inappropriate for discussion groups.  It makes the messages much larger and HTML introduces many possible exploits in links, image files, etc. (JC

It's 2008.  I don't think message size is an issue at this point.  I'd ask for whose inbox ca-liberty is the thin blue line between ascii bliss and HTML spam hell, but at this point it would be like debating the finer points of fax machine policy.  See ya in the blogosphere... (where Google Blog Search will have indexed this message by the time most of you read it, thanks to it being bcc'd in all its HTML glory to one of my blogs).