Starchild wrote:
SC) Presumably the Statement of Principles would be the last thing to fall to the "reformers'" blades (SC
Starchild, why act like it's a big mystery as to what changes we reformers might want to make to the SoP? Why not just have the intellectual courage to criticize any or all of
- the PlatCom's recommended SoP tweaks at http://libertarianmajority.net/pure-principles-platform, or
- my Greatest Hits SoP, or
Or is it just more fun to pretend you're defending the LP's principles against those who want to "abandon" them?
I would think that a defender of "principle" would be more about substance, and less about rhetoric. Or is this an (ironic) case of a radical deciding that the ends (defending the SoP) justify the means (substance-free rhetoric about "blades")?
