> Are you retracting what you wrote below or defending it?
I asked questions. My questions stand.
> Selling your votes in Congress will be felony and a crime against the taxpayers.
I didn't ask about congressmen selling votes. Congressmen don't
represent only themselves.
> A voter has no more natural right to sell his vote than a juror has a right to take a bribe for conviction or acquital.
>
A juror represents society. A voter represents himself. Apples and
oranges, again.
> As for evidence that paper vote counting was also rigged, I would consider it proof enough that officials were willing to go to jail rather than recount those ballots.
>
That wasn't their choice. They apparently were just trying to get out
of re-counting 100% of the county's ballots, by being selective with the
3% sample.
If this is your standard of evidence about proving a conspiracy to
fabricate vote counts in order to influence an election outcome, that
tells me all I need to know.
