Tom, again: the issue isn't whether the LPCA newsletter simply affirms and promotes the LP's stated position against intervention. When our newsletter was edited by Bruce Cohen and me -- both liberventionists -- we ran five pieces of non-paid content that affirmed the party's position on intervention, and zero that expressed our dissenting view. By contrast, Sipos is running 2 to 4 antiwar pieces per issue. It's an obsession with him, he effectively admits it. It's just silly for anybody to assert that there's no such thing as over-emphasizing an issue that -- despite its presence in the platform -- nevertheless has one of the highest levels of dissent in the party.