Bruce's moderation and I couldn't confirm your characterization of it.
Nothing you've said has contradicted anything I wrote in my initial
response (repeated below), and all I've said about your
characterizations of what Bruce allegedly did is that you've offered no
evidence to back up your perceptions/memories. I don't see how this
constitutes trying to "show everyone how wrong" you are. I invite you
to re-read my initial response to you below and decide what I wrote that
was responsible for the subsequent "petty back-and-forth".
Starchild, I don't agree with most of Bruce's characterizations of you,
but I don't recall any times when Bruce moderated you because of message
substance rather than format. Those mal-formatted messages from you were
very annoying -- mainly because I usually want to read what you write --
and it's hardly "nonsense" to say that manual carriage returns would
have worked around the problem. I'm glad you eventually figured out a
more elegant solution.