Michael Breland wrote:
MB) If your brother is really interested, he can go to www.bushlies.net and get all the quotations and citations he could care to read, I personally do not have time to sit here and re-type every single one. (MB
Learn to read. I didn't challenge you to "re-type every single one". I challenged you to cut and paste a single one. Make it your single best most clearcut example, so that I can then tease you about how all the rest of your examples are certified by you as even weaker than the one I demolish.
So how about it, Mikey? Got game?
- Type a quotation mark. (It's on the right side of your keyboard somewhere.)
- Cut and paste an official White House statement made before the invasion arguing for it.
- Type another quotation mark.
- Give evidence that the statement was false. (Not merely misleading or exaggerated or incomplete or imprecise, but that its grammatical negation was true.)
- Give evidence that Bush KNEW the statement was false.
MB) isn't "libertarian intelligence" an oxymoron? (rhetorical) (MB
The parenthetical fig leaf you used should have been more like: "(pathetic ad hominem)". Or, given how many libertarians have fled (just like you) from my challenge, maybe: "(ironic)".
You have no idea who you're dealing with. Do you want to talk Fahrenheit 911? Saudi Learjet? Downing Street Memo? the 158 mentions of Iraq in the 9/11 Commission report? April Glaspie? Teicher's affidavit? Rumsfeld 1983 Baghdad trip? American WMD sales to Iraq? Saddam's support for anti-American terrorists? Bush's "lies" in his pre-invasion speech? UNSCR 1441? Saddam's bodycount? Halliburton profits? Bush's sales of Harken stock? I've covered all this ground and more. Think you've got something I haven't already dissected before? Bring it.
