Sounds like somebody needs to ask a tough question to Dr. Ruwart.
See also:
"Full safeguards"? If you think the 2004 platform calls for the safeguards I say above are missing, then quote it. Go ahead. Try.
I'm not on the side saying their proposed Platform is a detailed, comprehensive vision of how a libertarian society would operate, so spare us the trumped-up hypocrisy charge. If you actually care about facts instead of boorish name-calling, my wet-dream platform is in fact more comprehensive on due process rights than either the Bill of Rights or the 2004 platform:
http://ecolibertarian.org/manifesto. But if you want to see the best extant declaration of such rights, go to http://libertarianmajority.net/bills-of-rights-archive and search for the string "1948".
Your prove-a-negative objection is specious. If I'm on trial for a capital crime in Ruwarchotopia, and you're the only witness who can place me far away from the crime scene, then I'd like to have a little more than just Scooby snacks to entice you to come to court and keep me out of the hangman's noose.
Still, nice try. Mixed in with your name-calling, you actually strung together a few attempted arguments, and required me to cite some facts to rebut you. This is progress. Others here can learn from your example.
