Don Grundmann, if you want to debate religion with me, step up and be the first to accept my Atheist Cage Match Challenge: http://humanknowledge.net/Philosophy/Metaphysics/Theology/Challenge.html. However you want to debate religion with me, I'll be happy to add you to my trophy case of all the Christian apologists who have tried before you: http://humanknowledge.net/Correspondence/index.html#AtheistPolemics
The fact remains: humanists don't claim that "X said so" ends a debate about morality, even if X is the humanist himself. Humanists instead explicitly say that an argument for an ethical proposition should not be considered valid by you if you cannot see the force of the argument by the light of your own reason.
Again, the available arguments for evolution and against creationism are too overwhelmingly powerful for me to bother trying to add to them. Come back when you've refuted http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/outline.html. Until then, keep heaping verbal abuse on people who disagree with you -- it undermines your arguments (to the extent you've offered any) quite effectively.
